Thread:Una74/@comment-71.58.210.121-20171010133156/@comment-23.28.36.106-20171025211141

I clicked "reply" instead of preview and cannot go back. I am continuing the above: About calling people who quoted what Berube said about Paterno slanderous. That's not slander. I think Berube meant "libel" but it's neither. With the information available in 2012, does saying Joe Paterno could be innocent amount to apology? Many people think so. Michael Berube that wrote that in his article in 2012. I see no reason why that should be a problem. The real problem I see, and what is very strange, is how much more anger Michael Berube has for people who quote him on the internet than he has for Paterno.

I don't like what Michael Berube said about Rebecca Schuman. I think it was inappropriate and, especially since she was pregnant at the time, WAY out of line. But if he respects the terms of use, I think Berube should be able to say whatever he wants.