Universities to fear

This page is for applicants to warn others of institutions/departments with less than reputable practices. This way we can all avoid the bad ones!

Back to AcademicJobSearch


 * If you wish to post NICE COMMENTS or REBUTTALS, they go on the Universities to love page. This in particular goes for people who delete posts or post insults about other posters. Everyone reading this site knows that the context of many posts are fueled by disgruntled faculty who leave or get let go. That is why we have both a place for good comments (Universities to Love) and bad comments (Universities to Hate). If a place is really good, then they will discredit comments on here during their visits. Deleting comments or insulting others only reflects poorly on the school in question.

Formatting for the tables
Please add responses using an asterisk to denote a bullet point.

Is there a way to fix the line wrapping? The text is stretching out to infinity such that I have to scroll sideways several times to read a sentence. '''Fixed, please do not add extra paragraph breaks in the entries, this will mess up the table. '''

Well, somebody messed the line wrapping up again... I still don't see how people finish PhDs, and still can't figure out to press &lt;Preview&gt;! Fixed it.

How to add a school
May we please have instructions on how to add a school? '''I second this. The table is so complicated, I am afraid, no one is going to post. '''

A: Hit edit and then right click in the table and use "insert row" to add a new blank entry.

[person who requested entry for Univ of Chicago--it has been inserted into the table. Whoever keeps reverting this edit, get a grip! it belongs in the table and not here!]

I did it!! I fixed the scrolling problem! Only four hours later... I wasn't going to bed tonight until I figured out what the bloody problem was and made it readable again.

2) DON'T use hard returns before your entry, as tempting as it might be. This will throw the table formatting off and give everyone a headache.
[I just spent another 3 hours today cleaning up the formatting problems caused by people not reading the directions-April 21] ====3) To create a new Department entry in the same school and line up your comment with that Department, insert a new row and duplicate the school name, then add your Department and Issue/Date entry.====

If you enter a new Department entry below an existing one in the same row and try to space it out using hard returns so that your comment lines up visually with your Department entry (as someone did with their French entry in the University of Vermont, which I italicized to set it apart from the previous entry), you will throw the formatting off (and someone will have to spend hours fixing it again).

6) Please DATE your entries! And put them in alphabetical order in the appropriate sections.
Thank you!

All Entries still present, now divided into Current, Chronic, and Old Tables. I am struck that there are no recent complaints about lack of contact, lack of reimbursement, rudeness, etc. While the market may have gotten worse, there seems to be a rising level of humanity / accountability promoting good behavior.
 * I wish it were that. I think it's that candidates are stark raving terrified. Check out the person on the venting page who was offered a job, given 2 days to answer, and then had the offer rescinded. He/she hasn't posted the details here!
 * I have now!
 * The reason the complaints are dropping is because people don't know about this page, and when they post on the regular one it gets deleted or moved here, doubtless by wiki admins with the best of intentions.

Comments
Considering how many universities and colleges never follow up (rejection letter, etc.) on interviews or visits, has this become the standard? Is it even worth complaining about anymore? General Q: how is it possible that any department can get away with NOT reimbursing a visiting candidate for travel expenses? It's appalling. Surely MLA (and other organizations) could do something to monitor or even "motivate" departments who engage in this kind of conduct (e.g., not allowing them to list job postings on the Job Information List the following year). Grad students especially need to be protected from such things.
 * Response #1: No. It's absurd to bitch about this. I cannot count the number of universities that never acknowledged receipt, post-conference interview, post-campus interview, etc. Are you really going to counsel colleagues to avoid applying to X university simply b/c you they sent a formulaic rejection letter or b/c they never sent out a rejection letter? Get over yourselves!
 * Response #2: Maybe it's absurd to get bent out of shape about form letters and such, but it seems fair to ask search committee members to remember that applicants are also colleagues, and those of us who are in this business for the long haul do well to keep that fact in mind, whichever side of the interview table we happen to be on. For more, see Advice to Search Committees, #12.
 * Respnse #3: I don't think it is hubris to be asked to be treated like a human being. Formulaic letters are one thing but deafening silence is demeaning. A tiny excuse is that chairs of search committees (I was one myself and have served as a member of several other search committees) are told never to notify candidates that have been short-listed for the AHA in case none of the campus candidates work out then you don't want the other AHA interviewed candidates to have already taken other jobs. However, I think this is a cruel and stupid rationale. When I chaired the search, I insisted on notifying candidates we interviewed at the AHA but did not invite to campus. I had to do it "unoffically" though by email. Beware those who use the "legal" excuse as cover for their own laziness. The candidates are people and must be treated with at least some modicum of decency.

Q: Can we rename this page "Universities to loathe"? Or, "Universities to hate"? Either go better with "love" as a polar opposite. (I don't know about anyone else, but when I've a bad experience, I don't fear, I loathe).

Q: This is a fantastic resource, and thanks to whoever invented it! However, it seems like it ought to be encouraged to have people put at least rough dates on their postings below? I don't know how old some of these postings are, but we all know bad administrators can go away and problems be addressed, and it would be fairer to the schools represented if people knew that the complaint was a year out of date, for instance.